Hmm, the actual numbers speak for themselves.
Bush won a majority of the votes in 31 states vs 19 states for Kerry. Of those 31 states, Bush had a greater than 10% margin of victory in 17 of them. Sounds pretty broad based to me.
Viewed in that fashion, you could call it a landslide, couldn't you?
Given that CA and NY account for 86 electoral votes, take those 2 states out of the count and Kerry would have had less than 170 electoral votes and +- 11 million fewer votes.
I stand by my earlier statements, Bush's popularity was much higher in 2004 and Kerry was a weak candidate.
I am not looking forward to the red / blue map next week, though.