Wish I could claim that I thought the problem of 'racism' could be solved just by thinking about our use of a word.
Is there variety among humans? Of course, I would hardly deny this. I'm just claiming that this variety isn't racial variety. We ascribe too much difference and otherness and perhaps superiority through the unexamined use of this word. Many do this on the most spurious and superficial of physical or cultural evidence, not even post mortem examination!You can call them whatever you like: races, ethnic groups, sub groups, whatever. Hell, call them banana daqueries if you like. It doesn't change the fact that, for example, any competent medical student can differentiate between Mongoloid, Negroid or Caucasians, just by examining the skulls!
You argue unnecessarily for how could I, or anyone reasonable, disagree that xenophobia is a bad thing? I'm not for discrimination just because I draw attention to the use of a word, so do you think you could take that as read and focus more on the use of language which is the reason I started this thread?True, there are many, many blends of these 'races', and the blending is growing more and more common as the years progress, and that's a good thing, both socially and genetically. But at this point in time there are still many differences, physically and genetically, between the groups.
And none of it has anything to do with racism! Racism is a strictly social and emotional issue, not a genetic one. It's an issue we must fight every day, and keep on fighting to eradicate it. But let's not try to hide the truth in politically correct statements which sound good but have no real meat to them. Are there differences between us? Absolutely, and that's a good thing. Do these differences make someone else better or worse than me? Absolutely NOT!
You can turn this into a thread on political correctness if you like, but labeling something you disagree with as PC does not make it so, and tends to stymie the actual argument.