Sexual responsiveness?

[steelish]

Restriction and the 'no touch' rule can be much harder on some than others. Like so many things BDSM, it can be tailored to the subs reactions. For a highly sexual slave, I prefer to have her in as much of a state of arousal as possible when restricting orgasms. This means plenty of masturbation to keep her on edge. I'd rather her be focusing on maintaining arousal than on 'ignoring' her sexuality. Plus it allows me to work on her begging technique. If she misbehaves of otherwise displeases, or needs correction or punishment, I can take masturbation away.

Wow. *note to self: Keep Mastrovenice away from Forgemstr!*

(I think it would be even harder to follow the "no touch" rule AFTER having done T&D on myself continuously)

[sinderella]

even if my Master didn't impose restrictions, i would restrict myself because i found that it made me all the more ready, eager and 'open-minded' when we were playing together...it's like refusing to eat chocolate because you know a big party is coming up, where they will be serving all kinds of exquisite chocolate treats, so you want to make sure you enjoy them, instead of being stuffed already with chocolates beforehand...

[Mastrovenice]

even if my Master didn't impose restrictions, i would restrict myself because i found that it made me all the more ready, eager and 'open-minded' when we were playing together...it's like refusing to eat chocolate because you know a big party is coming up, where they will be serving all kinds of exquisite chocolate treats, so you want to make sure you enjoy them, instead of being stuffed already with chocolates beforehand...

Or think of it another way. Instead of eating the chocolates before the party, what if you just had them on the counter, so you could see them, smell them, touch them, but NOT eat them yet... Perhaps you would be even more ready to stuff yourself when the time came, and the treat would be that much more rewarding after salivating over them all day....

[steelish]

Or think of it another way. Instead of eating the chocolates before the party, what if you just had them on the counter, so you could see them, smell them, touch them, but NOT eat them yet... Perhaps you would be even more ready to stuff yourself when the time came, and the treat would be that much more rewarding after salivating over them all day....

How devious! The proverbial dangling carrot!

[caligirl{Rob}]

How devious! The proverbial dangling carrot!

LMAO...you and veggies!!!!!! hmmmm yes I recall a dangling carrot :P

[BelovedPet]

Or think of it another way. Instead of eating the chocolates before the party, what if you just had them on the counter, so you could see them, smell them, touch them, but NOT eat them yet... Perhaps you would be even more ready to stuff yourself when the time came, and the treat would be that much more rewarding after salivating over them all day....

Is it hot in here or is it just me? <fanning self>

[voxelectronica]

even if my Master didn't impose restrictions, i would restrict myself because i found that it made me all the more ready, eager and 'open-minded' when we were playing together...it's like refusing to eat chocolate because you know a big party is coming up, where they will be serving all kinds of exquisite chocolate treats, so you want to make sure you enjoy them, instead of being stuffed already with chocolates beforehand...

beautiful.

[uncollared-katie]

i had a Master once long while ago who put me under restriction - no cumming, no playing no touching... This was extremely frustrating and really in the end didnt enhance our time together... The main reason is on the nights we were not together the no cumming, no touching made sleep difficult to attain... and then I was exhausted by the time we were together... He decided sleep was more important and lifted the restriction

[Oak]

Well! It's of course something about control. A way to show the sub... who's in control of her body and that it surely isn't her/him. 2nd it's of course nice to have a always very wet and ready sub.