If its all the same with you mkemse I will decide for myself what it is and is not a issue of.

So if person A recieved money from person B should B dictate wage caps and excersise other forms of control over A's company?

Do we agree with Obama? Do we just luvvvvv our messiah? Is the honeymoon over, did it ever begin? 500 fucking dollars a year??? Bonuses but in stock only?? thake that evil corperate ceo? Please give me a f'ing break.



Do we who warned you he is going to head our country towards socialism approve or feel justified when he(Obama) begins to take the predicted steps?

Basically the idea is "does the governemnt have the power or right to excersise such control?"

I do believe that anyone making and keeping over 100K a year is a greedy bastard.

I also do not believe any government should tell you how much of your money you should keep.

If the stockholder doesnt like what the company who's stock he or she owns is doing (such as paying its employees etc) then they should perhaps sell the stock or use thier influence with the company's board of directors to change things and or dont buy the product they produce anymore. (gods I wish we could do that with the government too bad its not a company)

I also don't believe the government should have given one red cent to ANY of the companies period. Its my tax money I want it back in my pocket not lining the pocket of some politicians pals(any corperation).

But heck I doubt that will happen. I doubt I will get my money back. It will be spent on more BS programs and even more of it will be given away on usless stopgate cuases that all ready are known to not have worked when used in the past.

WTF.... I ask you is that slap on the wrist Obama gave the ceo's intended to do anything other than fool more taxpaying sheep into supporting him?