Do you actually want to play with "punishment", or do you want to play with "pain", and/or "humiliation"? They are nearly totally separate things.

The deepest desire of my (almost) pet erish is to be a "pet". That's largely a matter of "discipline". she loves proving herself to me, so that's one purpose of corporal punishment (whipping, nipple clamps, etc). she can take a lot in those situations. Also tickling.

she loves being trained, and that's another purpose. Everything from posture and position to forgetting a "Sir" every now and then. The difference is amazing. She wants to be "perfect" so badly that a couple of relatively light strokes for actual punishment (which I've only done once) has her lip quivering as she holds back tears. But 15 much harder strokes on a "prove herself" session with continual hair stroking and "good girl" comments can have her simply beaming with pride. (and me, too). For actual punishment, she can be punished with a word or two. I suspect that a simple "bad girl" would hurt her more than just about anything I could do with a crop (but I've never tried. It's hard to punish such an amazingly sweet and gentle creature).

And she loves pleasure/pain play, which is my very favorite use. We just had her first pleasure/pain session Friday. she said it was the most intense orgasm of her whole life. (It certainly was a messy one). Fairly light cropping and flogging, because of how easily she marks up. Much heavier tickling and ice play than anything we had tried before.