Quote Originally Posted by damyanti View Post
All the propaganda aside even the most zealous Bush supporters are painfully aware how harshly his presidency will be judged. All the revisionist tomes wont change the fact that the more time passes the more harsh History's verdict will be.

However a very intersting question comes to mind....How much different Bush presidency would have been if he had the backbone to pick another VP?

Bush never striked me as a particularly evil person, a spoiled rich brat- yes, juvenile, rude, irresponsible, lacking intelligence and utterly incompetent- omg, Yes.

But can you imagine him without Cheney or Rove?

Then again without Rove there never would have been president G.W.
Bush himselfwas never EVIL, he had very poor choices for VP. Attorney Genenral and he was neevr complete transparent with the Americna People on any Major issue, the always claim "Excutive Privledge" all the time

Not to mention he took more vacation time then any President in History and had more people in his ADM convicted of crimes then any other President and this includes Nixon, by nature I am sure he is a very nice person, his descions on Cabinet Positions and VP were terrible