Quote Originally Posted by steel1sh View Post
I never said "this is all natural". What I said is that my theory is the planet has a natural life cycle and it's too soon in mankind's existence to PROVE that we have that much of a negative effect on it's cycle.
And I said there was absolutely no proof of this hypothesis. All you have as evidence is wishful thinking.

Again, that is not what I said. It's not that I believe we have absolutely no effect whatsoever...it's that I find it difficult to believe that in the last 200 years of technological advancement, that we influenced the planet to that degree.
No offense, but your lack of imagination isn't enough to sway me to your argument.

It's easy to find both pros and cons
It'd be a lot easier to believe the cons if we didn't have proof that it's all untrue.

On a less serious note, you can find proof-positive of global warming here