Quote Originally Posted by SadisticNature View Post
You claim to support the following:

(I) You are entitled to free speech because of the constitution.
The statement is true, but you are thereby postulating and absolute right. That aside you citation is moot.
Quote Originally Posted by SadisticNature View Post
(II) The constitution is not a document subject to modern interpretations.
Where have I said that? The Constitution requires strict interpretation.

So I've pointed out the most famous ruling where the government stripped a supposive constitutional right to free speech. Do you believe the ruling was outright wrong?

It seems to me you can't argue that the constitution should be interpreted as it was written then argue historical constitutional cases are irrelevant and don't reflect the country now, unless you are claiming the ruling was incorrect in those cases.[/QUOTE]
As stated above the ruling is moot!