
Originally Posted by
SadisticNature
I've covered several times why Emergency Care doesn't meet the standard of care, and you have responded to it in the past.
Here we go again.
Emergency care just covers life-threatening care. It doesn't cover what most of us would want. If I have a choice between an expensive surgery to save a limb or a less expensive amputation as a result of you hitting me, should I be forced into an amputation because you don't have the ability to pay damages, even if you have protective assets that would cover those costs?