This is so far beyond right that it's unfathomable. If I can convince some people that the moon is made of green cheese, does that make me right? Hogwash! It just makes me persuasive. That's why we have to rely on evidence, not on rhetoric. But evidence is tedious, boring, dull, and it goes downhill from there. Rhetoric is much more exciting, and much more enjoyable. Entire religions are based upon this, as well as most political systems.
Which is why economy cannot be a science. It's far closer to a religion.Economy is all about trust and confidence in promises.
Oh, yeah. This will work.So to answer your question - let the economists advise but not decide. Let the president decide based on what astrologer (if any) he believes. Let the people believe the president and then whatever the president said will come to pass.
That would have been my guess.How's that for a theory. Didn't take me years, just a crate of beer to come up with that little thesis.