Quote Originally Posted by denuseri View Post
What is in question and where I find the 'evidence" lacking or contravertibley hazy, is in the conclussion (not vertible evidence of repeatable peer reviewed experiments) that the warming is a direct or sole result of humanity's presence and or that the warming is going to continue unabated becuase of us if we dont change everything yesterday.

This does not mean that I am saying we don't or can't contribute to it, it simpley means I dont see any real proof as of yet that we are the sole cuase.
I'll go along with you here. I also don't think there's enough evidence to say we are the sole cause. The problem is far too complex to say that. There are things we still don't know about the climate and what effects certain things have upon it.

But I also feel that the evidence FOR global warming is strong, and the evidence that our CO2 emissions are adding to the problem is just as strong. Doing something about that is in all of our interests. Letting governments take the lead, though, is suicidal.