But what are you supposed to do when you offer your neighbor help and he refuses it? And not only refuses it, but keeps tossing burning embers towards your house?
No, we are not responsible for each other. Or not every other person. We accept responsibility for some, and those we help as much as we can. But I, for one, will not accept responsibility for every hungry person in the world.Are we not, on a human level, all responsible for each other? And does not humanity, as a whole, benefit when we help each other in times of need?
You think not?Mexico is not sending us their "problem" people;
A quote from that article: "The latest flap is about a booklet produced by the Mexican government that is targeted at those Mexicans that may be considering crossing the border illegally. Some radical sites are even suggesting "It is a guide on how to enter the US illegally. It is an act of war. It is part of a long-term plan to flood the US, particularly California and the Southwest, with illegal Mexicans...". [emphasis mine]
Except that sometimes you have to let some patients die in order to save others because you don't have the resources for all.Except in triage, the person who needs it the most is the person who gets the aid, not the person who is following the rules better.
The greatest number who can be saved with the resources at hand should get the aid. Giving everything to a few desperate cases only pushes those less desperate into a more desperate position. Spreading the resources to as many as possible, though, will lift many out of desperation, while leaving a relative few in a more desperate situation. That's triage: saving as many as possible with what you have.So by that logic, whoever is poorer should get the aid, not whoever is more legal