Econ 101

[chuck]

My contention need no other "evidence" for its veracity from my perspective than my word good Sir.

As implied in my last post to TantricSoul, one has to earn the right to have an unsubstantiated statement accepted.

According to the couple who made the onesided decisons on what was good or bad in the way of answers for their study.

That is the only valid criticism of the study made so far. It would help if you were more specific or thought that all of the questions were tainted.

Looks like you found your own evidence.

It looks like you accept "apples and oranges" comparisons as valid.

Not really sugar.

Condescension noted.

Well like Tantric said earlier, its hard to comunicate effectively when the reader sees what he or she wants to see, instead of what was actually written.

It is also difficult to communicate when one writes one thing but means something else.