I am glad I read yours before I responded to the previous message. Seeing that it was you is why that happened. Often save me the time taken to reply.

Just a few points though. The previous writer seems to want no management at all. You on the other hand seem to understand some management is necessary. I think it is likely that you will already know of the necessity for the points I am going to include.
  • Providing a facility
    • Rent, or mortgage
    • PMI if there is a mortgage
    • heat
    • hot water
    • electricity
    • License fees
    • Liability insurance
    • business insurance
  • Services
    • HR services
    • Taxes
    • Medical evaluation
    • provider licensing
    • payroll
    • security
    • supplies
    • maintenance
[/LIST]

I am sure there may be a few things I overlooked but I do think this explains why it may appear that the management is taking more than they should.


Quote Originally Posted by Thorne View Post
Isn't this basically a problem in any industry? The owners/managers make much more money than the laborers. But something along the lines of beauty shops/hair salons is an option. The owner supplies the building and security for a fixed fee while the prostitute works as an independent contractor.


Not to mention providing tax dollars and licensing fees to cash-strapped communities.

I wonder if you could claim a medical deduction for using a licensed prostitute, for stress reduction. Maybe with a prescription?