Climategate

[Thorne]

I am referring to climatologists. There are just as many that do not believe in global climate change as there are that do. Big difference those that disagree are impartial and receive zero government funding. Those that espouse global climate change either are funded by the government OR funded by corporations that are heavily invested in "going green"

I challenge you to back up this claim. Show me your sources. (And if you even ONCE quote Faux News, or Bill O'Reilly, or Glenn Beck, I think I'll scream!

Again, this depends largely on whose study one is reading and quoting.

And I challenge you again. Show me the studies which claim differently.

Of course we all know that all current data is beyond reproach. Not one of the global climate crowd has been caught in a lie. Everything in Al Gore's book, and the movie based on the book is all true. Never ever been called into question.

NO scientific data is beyond question. ALL data is studied and restudied and questioned and tested. Yes, mistakes can be made. They are generally discovered, though, through the scientific method. And Al Gore, and his global climate buddies, can go suck eggs as far as I'm concerned. I'm talking science, not politics.

Again I say the scientists that agree with global climate change are in the pocket(s) of politicians, media, and industrial leaders. This is easily verifiable.

So verify it! Show your sources, once again. But in truth, this kind of claim is very common among conspiracy theorists. ANY evidence which disagrees with their preconceived ideas is automatically wrong, put forth by those in the pockets of the politicians.

I never said we would destroy humanity. There were survivors in Japan. There would be survivors no doubt. As for evolving...All I can say is perhaps your ancestors came from apes or other life forms. Mine did not. We could argue all day about that I am sure. I believe evolution is a myth at best.

Which makes any scientific claims you might make immediately suspect. Anyone who cannot understand at least the basic concept of evolution or the scientific method has no business making claims about science.

The ENTIRE point of view on global climate control IS political. It's a way to regulate the United States, pick Our pockets more. Make us responsible for the world. How come NO ONE says jack shit about China. A Place that is so polluted, the Christian Bale couldn't even swim in Shang Hai harbor. Let's ALL go green. When China commits, then let's talk about the USA following Before any one wonders what the China think is all about. They have not agreed to any treaty on "global climate change". But dammit let's cripple America more, lose more American jobs, and gain nothing. Except a much poorer country.

And again, this is all political, having absolutely NOTHING to do with whether or not the climate is changing. Definitely, fight the politics. But you better be armed with facts, not fairy tales.

Not to beat the proverbial dead horse here. Many many many of these "pieces of evidence" come with their own questions. Many of them have been proven to be false. Or based upon false information. Some have even been completely made up. Of course this all falls on deaf ears.

I'm listening! Name your sources.

Humanity has not caused this.[/QUOTE]
And you know this how? Where's your evidence? Show me the SCIENCE, not the rhetoric.