Your exhibits C, D, E and F, which you did not label, are all variations on exhibit B. They claim a single years decline in global temperature to be a trend, rather than a possible anomaly. Has this trend continued since January 2008?

No, it has not. In fact, according to the CRU 2009 and 2010 were both significantly warmer than 2008, and in fact 2010 has tied with 2003 as the third warmest year on record, trailing behind only 1998 and 2005.

They also state that: "The period 2001-2010 (0.44°C above 1961-90 mean) was 0.20°C warmer than the 1991-2000 decade (0.24°C above 1961-90 mean). The warmest year of the entire series has been 1998, with a temperature of 0.55°C above the 1961-90 mean. After 1998, the next nine warmest years in the series are all in the decade 2001-2010. During this decade, only 2008 is not in the ten warmest years. Even though 2008 was the coldest year of the 21st century it was still the 12th warmest year of the whole record."

And in regards to the Antarctic ice sheet? That article is from - wit for it - 2008!

So five of your pieces of evidence against global warming are based upon a single anomalous year. This is not science, sir, this is cherry picking data.