i dont know if anyone still cares or reads about this post, and i didnt read all of it, but ill give my two sense of the occupy movement
1. you can empirically determine that the income inequality gap has increased in the last few decades.
2. as far as i can tell, the occupiers only care about banks getting more money, and most if not all are happy to be cupertino whores
3. most dont know what capitalism is, but they love bashing it. its the same problem as the michael moore movie - bailouts to banks and excessive lobbying is not capitalism, its corporatism.
4. every occupier i know voted for obama, and were all on board for the taarp act when he first took office
5. instead of occupying wall street, they should be complaining to their representatives. if they are the 99%, then they have the power in a democracy/republic/democratic republic. instead of protesting people who are trying to make money, protest the elected officials who do nothing to stop them. even if someone wants socialism, the elected officials are the proper avenue to achieve change, not the people who are literally going to work.
6. everyone who lost their 401 ks back in 2008 benefit from these massive banks succeeding.