Sorry to be late but I am travelling at the moment and pc access is sort of on-and-off.
But if women were normally there in combat situations, don't you think the their porfessionel instincts would take over, and they would take the most injured first?
I don't understand.In a rescue situation take the injured, take the children, take the women, then take the men. Apply that logic to combat in reverse and you’d never see a single woman carrying a gun.
I don't see why not. Same argument as before, you get used to it.Sleeping Arrangements: When you’ve got limited or no tents in the field, bunks, rooms, ect. do you place women in the same barracks as men or do you need to have speical housing arrangments for them? Same goes for showers and the head. Well do you let openly gay men sleep in a room full of straight men or do you put them in the women’s barracks? Can’t we all be adults and keep it in our respective pants?
Precisely what they said on the Danish blogs I read.“When the bullets start flying I want and need two things from the person next to me and one of them sure as hell isn’t a swinging cock. Trust, in the individual and in the training they’ve received, and that training, oh and that they've got the cojones to use said training. I want the best trained, most experienced person for the job at my side. I don’t need to be worrying about them fucking up and I sure as hell won’t be thinking about pussy when someone’s got a gun pointed in my general direction and is pulling the trigger.”