Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Electrified Non-Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,073
    Post Thanks / Like
    First, the technical stuff. Don't be too overwhelmed -- I'm bored and a literature geek, a bad combo. And as always, feel free to ignore anything I suggest, my ego is far too hefty to be impacted

    Scowling then closing her eyes she inhaled a deep breath
    Sounds a bit awkward, I'd insert a couple commas at least, or revise the fragment. S/A "She scowled, closed her eyes, then inhaled a deep breath"
    un unattainable
    bible
    -> Bible
    A strange and slightly jarring transition from P2 to P3; the first mentions "sweet revenge," but the next starts out calling it an ugly emotion, graphically.
    No-one may not enter the kingdom of heaven
    Very awkward double negative.
    Her fresh and lovely face now contorted,
    The "Now" seems to imply a transition back to the present, ie after the murder; I'd suggest removing it.
    gapping
    -> gaping
    his now aged body
    The "now" again sounds awkward, implying another shift in time that isn't supposed to be there.
    phallic
    -> phallus
    stockng
    glasping, and unglasping
    Glasping?
    unfinishe
    snear
    hesititated
    his minded raced
    -> mind
    Nake
    she now slide those
    -> slid
    hime
    Instincitively
    And, his ankles
    Technically a sentence should never start with "and;" you can break that without much problem, but the comma should go -- it initiates an unnecessary pause.
    large sideboard cupboard.
    Too many boards.
    There shall there be any more pain
    Awkward
    Rebecca, leaned over him,
    Remove the first comma
    euphorisa
    thoughts of task
    insert "the"
    glisteing
    Tomorrow he would be a repentant man, now however, powerless to defend himself against her wicked temptation he took a deep breath and, like so many times before, he prepared to allow himslelf to be taken by the pleasures of the flesh.
    Change punctuation to: "Tomorrow, he would be a repentant man; now, however, powerless to defend himself against her wicked temptation, he took a deep breath and like so many times before, prepared to allow himslelf to be taken by the pleasures of the flesh."
    Rebeccas
    fot he
    <The cross, the symbol of suffering, her suffering each time> he coerced her into that that musky smelling room to be alone with him.
    Sentence fragment; needs a verb. "was"?
    She stood up, and walk
    no comma, walk -> walked
    crusaifix
    than 'crossed' herself
    -> then; no quotes around crossed, it's not a euphemism
    Turning, back towards him,
    Remove first comma.
    whispered a pray
    -> prayer
    contored
    sobbed, like
    no comma


    End of the technical part


    To answer your questions, while it's not particularly hard to follow I don't think you should jump around so much. Specifically you give away the beginning and end in the first 1/4 of the work, which means the rest is just...the rest. It leaves an incomplete story arc and leaves a very unsatisfying ending (we know what the future brings; we just read it; we don't even have to think about it for a second once we're done reading). The intro is very good, and I like the idea of beginning with the end, but when you start your flashbacks I'd highly recommend making them sequential. Particularly, although you alluded to it you never used any of the "little girl" flashbacks to actually add to the plot; either remove them all or utilize them to tell the story instead of the memories of the "earlier that evening" time frame.

    I can visualize some of what's going on rather graphically; you got the gore down well but other than 'he's between her knees' and a brief mention of her poise near the end, you never actually say what they look like. At one point his blood spattered in her pubic hair and I was surprised to learn she was nude (it was mentioned in a later time frame, but not that one).

    For all that, I was very impressed with the work. You're a great author, and this has a ton of potential. I think you stretched a bit too far to create an intricate structure at the cost of the story (as your question implies you already know), and that needs either some more tweaking and transitioning or a reworking to prevent interference with your story. That you came up with the structure at all and made it work reasonably well is a testament to your imagination and skill. When you pause to focus on description your language is amazing; a couple more pauses is all that's needed for elaboration. Well, and a quick spell check

    I'd definitely read this just for pleasure, and I look forward to seeing what you do with it!
    Back!
    With your fiendish books of gods
    With suffering self-righteous pain
    Back!
    With Hell-fire and vicious rods
    With repressed passion gone insane
    Back!
    I won't lose my soul, too.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    824
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Bragi View Post
    I've just finished, well, just about finished a new story. I realise it's not going to be everyone's cup of tea--it's about priest who has his penis hacked off by a woman he's molested as a child, but I wanted to write something different. Please, if you're a theist, or more particularly a Christian, don't get offended just back click now.

    I've been over it, but I particularly need to know if I've missed any typos, spelling or grammar mistakes, and if the punctuation is correct. I've chosen to write it back to front, so is easy enough to follow? Does it all make sense? Are you able to envisage what's happening? And, most important of all, to me, if you weren't reading it for the specific purpose of giving feedback, would you have still read it all?

    Thank you in advance,

    Alex
    Wow Alex ,
    You sure go for the power play on this one. Yeah picking on pedophile priests is a bit like taking pot shots at fish in a barrel but you manage to bring some stark and vulgar life into the story. I know EB has filled you in on every typo and nuance and I'll never be able to compete with that but just a heads up. You can white wash a number of grammar Faux Pas by including them within a quote. Just be consistent and keep those grammatical idiosyncrasies to a character's "Voice". The sad truth is most of us don't speak with perfect grammar and diction and there's no reason your characters should either. Makes them more memorable if they have a few linguistic quirks. Just don't overdo it.
    The story itself; yes I'd read it more out of morbid curiosity than any real driving interest. As I may have mentioned, I was raised in the wild by Jesuits, so I might be a little prejudice. Not my cup of tea but a powerful tale none the less.

    Quote Originally Posted by ElectricBadger View Post
    First, the technical stuff. Don't be too overwhelmed -- I'm bored and a literature geek, a bad combo. And as always, feel free to ignore anything I suggest, my ego is far too hefty to be impacted
    Damn Electric Badger,
    Now I've got a bad case of 'Proof Reader Envy'.
    Do you get bored often?
    Can I send you a couple chapters?
    Could I handle it?
    Mad Lews
    English does not borrow from other languages. English follows other languages into dark alleys, raps them over the head with a cudgel, then goes through their pockets for loose vocabulary and spare grammar.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top