Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort
Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Sadism

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Time Zone GMT
    Posts
    124
    Post Thanks / Like

    Different Strokes

    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectEuropa
    Sadism is very rarely mentioned on these pages yet it seems an essential requirement to be a Dom in my eyes.
    I don't think it's necessary to be sadistic to enjoy the dominant role. There are dominant masochists who enjoy the experience of the sub vicariously, and are more interested in controlling the sensations of the sub than getting off on the infliction of pain. It might seem like a subtle difference, but to both protagonists it makes a sensational, delicious difference. A sub has nowhere to hide from a dominant but sensitive masochist, and nothing to fear from someone who sees the experience from the inside out.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    381
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Spitman
    I don't think it's necessary to be sadistic to enjoy the dominant role. There are dominant masochists who enjoy the experience of the sub vicariously, and are more interested in controlling the sensations of the sub than getting off on the infliction of pain. It might seem like a subtle difference, but to both protagonists it makes a sensational, delicious difference. A sub has nowhere to hide from a dominant but sensitive masochist, and nothing to fear from someone who sees the experience from the inside out.
    Hmm I think there is a whole spectrum that various people inhabit and some move along it with ease and some are happy in their own particular place. Domination is not a form of paternalism, it is what it says, domination. OK we are on the whole civilised people and confront our kinks usually and preferably in cooperation with a partner who has a complimenting kink. However if we take away the sugar coating of cooperatoin and domination has no sadism in its make up, what is the motivation behind the domination?

  3. #3
    Recreational User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    ...on my knees...
    Posts
    237
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Spitman
    There are dominant masochists who enjoy the experience of the sub vicariously, and are more interested in controlling the sensations of the sub than getting off on the infliction of pain.
    Fascinating. I never thought of that angle. I wonder how many people who 'switch' are still enjoying the same element of the interaction, only vicariously.

    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectEuropa
    Hmm I think there is a whole spectrum that various people inhabit and some move along it with ease and some are happy in their own particular place. Domination is not a form of paternalism, it is what it says, domination. OK we are on the whole civilised people and confront our kinks usually and preferably in cooperation with a partner who has a complimenting kink. However if we take away the sugar coating of cooperatoin and domination has no sadism in its make up, what is the motivation behind the domination?
    Domination/submission comes in many, many flavours. Just like non-kink people can call themselves "breast-men" or "leg-men," people into D/s are getting off on different aspects of the relationship. Some people crave to humiliate or to be humiliated, and don't need a whip, cane, or clamp around to enjoy themselves. For those people... it's still called domination, because it involves control/giving up control. For a painslut like me, the sadistic streak my S.O. has is a must, but many people just don't need to go there. How about all the stories on this site where there is no infliction of pain at all? They're filled with domination--just of a different type. I think the only common denominator is the control part.
    "In through the kitchen door came the dancing girls, then everything on the menu mattered..."

  4. #4
    Sparkles in the dark
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    332
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectEuropa
    what is the motivation behind the domination?
    I think asking about a motivation is not adequate here. Motivation implies a choice.

    Nobody decides to get sexually aroused by XY. It is a relation of cause and effect beyond our control. It's not a matter of choice.

    For some people, domination is erotic. Being in control, calling the shots, being obeyed can work as a pleasure and a turn-on in its own right. Just as for the complement submissives, obedience to the other's instructions and submission to the other's actions causes an erotic charge, feelings of happiness, feelings of being fulfilled.

    I have a motivation when I choose to do something. If people act according to their preferences, the motivation is to cause those feelings.

    Some things we can influence to a degree. Among them are self-awareness, empathy and skill. (Everyone can probably add various other qualities.) I think it's a good idea to cultivate and practise them. Not least because it also has benefits for ourselves. And supports us in enjoying our many-flavoured kinks.
    Last edited by Ranai; 02-20-2005 at 08:26 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top