Did you hear about the man who tried to have sex with a dog, but the muscles in the dogs arsehole contracted, trapping the dog on the mans penis?
I presume it was a nice change for the docs to operate a man out of an asshole rather than operating something out of his asshole...I hear that happens quite frequently

Joking aside, I don't have an interest in bestiality per se, but I found this thread quite interesting so far, so I thought I'd chime in.

What really got me thinking was all the legal talk. Thing is, under my jurisdiction BDSM practices are actually illegal. Every lovely, caring and wonderful dom who decides to do whatever we agree upon strictly taken commits a crime. If he spanks me, canes me, crops me...whatever -- it's battery. The law insists that there is nothing like "consensual abuse". I, as a consenting submissive who really enjoys the act, am a victim under the law and need to be protected. Now I'm sure most of us will agree that it's okay -- as long as it is safe, sane and consensual.

For the vanilla world things that are common for BDSM people are actually "on the dark side". It's as much taboo to them as bestiality might be taboo to some of us. So I'd say as long as it safe, sane and consensual it has to be okay. Yes, I'm aware that animals can't use safe-words. But I believe that you can very well get a vibe whether the animal is in discomfort or pain if you pay attention -- as somebody already noted in this thread, sorry I forgot who it was

Although bestiality is nothing I'd ever try (and, to be perfectly honest, it actually gives me the creeps to consider it in earnest -- I'm not wanting to be judgemental, it's just not my thing at all) I find the thought quite interesting from a power/loss of control point of view.

Anyway, just my two cents!