Bestiality

[Ozme52]

please don't shoot me for not reading all of the 7 pages of posts...

BANG!!

it isn't possible to have a dogs consent in this, regardless of cooperation. It isn't possible. If the creed of this lifestyle is to include consensual, then this act as any act where the other party is not able to consent is not fair.

i do work with animals, and have for a long enough time to know that haircuts and baths and shots may not be consented to either...these as well as being trained not to eat my couch are not things they consent to but are for the good of the animal.

typically dogs do not hump humans for sexual pleasure, it is for dominance. dogs do not approach sex with the same intentions we do and it isn't fair to do this to anything that can't make a competant choice to do what your asking it.

I'll be blunter than ID... though the next two words are strictly mine and not to put them in his mouth.

It's rude and selfish to expect us to say to you exactly what we've already said in the 7 pages, (which I reread, btw, when the topic was bumped again 3 months ago...) If you'd read the thread and said you still have problems with the definition, concept, or circumstances, and told us why, presumably from a fresh perspective and not one hacked to death, I'd be happy to continue. But you didn't.

Which is a shame imo.

[thir]

BANG!!

I'll be blunter than ID... though the next two words are strictly mine and not to put them in his mouth.

It's rude and selfish to expect us to say to you exactly what we've already said in the 7 pages, (which I reread, btw, when the topic was bumped again 3 months ago...) If you'd read the thread and said you still have problems with the definition, concept, or circumstances, and told us why, presumably from a fresh perspective and not one hacked to death, I'd be happy to continue. But you didn't.

Which is a shame imo.

I'd like to ask two questions:

1) What does it mean that a topic is 'bumped'?

2) I can understand that it is best to read a whole thread before answering, although that can mean hours of reading. But is there any actual rules saying you have to do that?

3) Many topics are sort of ever greens that keep coming back, with new members or new things that arise in connection with them. While it is a good idea to refer to previous threads, is there anything wrong with posting a topic that has already been discussed? After all you can just ignore it.