Besides a bunch of falsehoods, Ian, you haven't advanced any reasons at all for your assertion we "shouldn't even think" of sending this guilty man to face trial. Neither Blunkett's eyesight not his memory is remotely relevant to the independent review carried out by a judge (not Blunkett, and after the Labour government was disposed of) into the matter. Could you at least answer the question you keep ducking: what criteria would you demand before sending McKinnon to face trial for the crimes he admitted to?