If the gulfstream stalls, really shuts down, which is a possibility, "The Day After Tomorrow" wont happen like it did in the movie, freezing choppers in mid air, gigantic "cold air down sucks" etc, but it could lead to extreme colds in regions that were temperate to this day, dry out land more away from the coast, oh, and it will happen over a decade or two, not in one day.

So your argument is "we are not responsible and we cant do anything about it", did i get that about right?

That BBC thing, um, yeah, it wasnt a BBC thing, it was a documentary called something along The Great Global Warming Swindle or equally stupid. It cut together bits and pieces, off hand comments, negative examples etc and made them look like they were real, while not footing into facts. The big gas thing where there wasnt much to go around? Gas accounts for only a part of CO2 output. Think coal, you cant have it more directly carbon to air than that.

CO2 is measured in parts per million. So since you think this is crap, lets look a bit at more facts.

www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0320-11.htm
Published March 20, 2004. At that point the increase was 3 parts per million a year. Before the industrial reveolution we were talking 280 parts per million. Dont just take that guys word for it, lets see what some goverment agency has to say.
cdiac.ornl.gov/pns/current_ghg.html

So the current values given is a value from 2004, at 377, but they also say in the first article its rising 3 per year so we are at 386 now roughly. It was 280 in average, all trhought the history of the planet we can look back at (ice cores go back to 650'000 years). Now all of a suddern we got a rough third more, or 100 parts per million more CO2. Looking at temperature graphs since humans keep records, shows you a very fascinating relation. Oh and "they go appart big" is a matter of scaling, not a matter of data. If you approximate the start and the end to be about in the same area on a graph, you will notice these weird patterns of spikes (up and down) in temperature and CO2 and how fascinatingly well they line up.

Sience does not equal sience. You can leave out data, chose to interpret data in your own way (causality anyone?) and come to very nice conclusions that undermine anything you want, or get paid for.

The only difference is when you have hundreds of scientists, from all over the planet come to agree on the same thing, coming to the same conclusion, then you can be pretty sure they are on the right track. And did that not happen very recently? Oh right i think they call themselves the IPCC...

www.ipcc.ch

Just in case you were living under a rock, they came to the conclusion that it is human beings. And those are experts in those fields from all over the world. Now you and me can talk about this for ages, but i stick with the guys that know their stuff.