Art or thinly veiled kiddy porn?

[Thorne]

not neccasarily that particular child, but when said paedophile gets aroused viewing such 'art' (as Alex said earlier,when we look at something that turns us on we want to and often do act on it) and if there's some child 'handy' at the time...what then?

Then you run into the same problem we will always have, whether its pictures of children or of paid adult women in bondage/torture images. If the person viewing those bondage/torture images becomes aroused to the point of committing a crime, who's responsible, the images or the aroused nut who cannot distinguish fantasy from reality?

ANY image, of any kind, can be construed as arousing to SOMEONE! Any story, especially on this site, could be considered inflammatory to some sicko. Should we shut down the internet? Close the libraries? Burn all the books and photographs, just to try to keep one sicko from going out of control? We might as well just lock ourselves up and throw away the keys.

Not the way I choose to live, thank you.