I'm pretty sure she was saying "clarifying" ironically since she wasn't being unclear in the first place. You took the most farfetched interpretation of her remarks possible, and then argued against it.
If you want to argue against some mystery person who is flat-out saying that a person in the situation you described should be condemned, then maybe you should start your own thread, and argue against yourself, and the straw-man you keep pulling out of nowhere.So on to the rest.
So those who commit to love... and stop loving...
Those who commit to honor... and stop honoring...
Those who commit to cherish... and stop cherishing...
That's all okay. And the person who sees all the other vows broken, who may have children to consider, who may not be financially ready to leave, who may even be abused... he or she is a selfish dog for looking for companionship?
Sorry but YOU, are empty of compassion.
She isn't making the argument that you just described. Nobody here is making it. You are actually just making this position up out of thin air, and then arguing against it.
EDIT: But I could be wrong since she just posted this:
This is closer to the argument you suspected was hiding behind her words. But it certainly wasn't present at the time you posted.Originally Posted by bambina