Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort

View Poll Results: Should same sex Marrige be legalized?

Voters
128. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, in everyway in everyplace.

    72 56.25%
  • No, not ever.

    13 10.16%
  • Yes, but it shouldn't be called marrige.

    23 17.97%
  • Let each individual state/country decide for it's self.

    20 15.63%
Results 1 to 30 of 83

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    142
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Diablo View Post
    But it is the job of the government to protect the minority from the votes of the majority.
    No it isn't. That's the job of the Constitution, marriage isn't mentioned in the constitution.

    Quote Originally Posted by Diablo View Post
    The American Constitution was based on the idea that the dirty masses were not quite smart enough to be really in charge of decision making.
    No the constitution was there to make certain rights unalienable. Marriage wasn't one of those rights.


    Quote Originally Posted by Diablo View Post
    But 2 people regardless of gender to form a union with legal rights is not one of them and the government other than recognizing that a union has occurred between 2, or if you want more should have no say.
    This is the problem I have with gay marriage proponents. You agree that the government should not be involved then argue the case that they should. You agreed that the government has no place in marriage and are then go to argue that it's the governments job to protect it.

    Well it isn't. The government is not there to protect anyone. There was a time when the police were privatized.

  2. #2
    Proud of My Little One
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,090
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by voxelectronica View Post
    No it isn't. That's the job of the Constitution, marriage isn't mentioned in the constitution.

    No the constitution was there to make certain rights unalienable. Marriage wasn't one of those rights.

    This is the problem I have with gay marriage proponents. You agree that the government should not be involved then argue the case that they should. You agreed that the government has no place in marriage and are then go to argue that it's the governments job to protect it.

    Well it isn't. The government is not there to protect anyone. There was a time when the police were privatized.
    So the Magical Piece of parchment flies around protecting people? No the Government with in the framework of the Constitution does.

    Now we have the Unalienable Rights of the Decleration of Independence in the Constitution. The Constitution was formed to define the government and its powers. The Bill of rights including freedom of religion, which is the reason against gay marriage and this ridiculous semantics argument, were added.

    I never said they should be involved with religious marriage but civil union that grants x rights and marriage that grants the same rights is the same thing in a legal sense and legality is the realm of Government.

    I give up trying to use any sort of reason with you have fun in your anarchy.
    I will forever cherish the Gift My Little One has given to Me.

    Welcome Domination and it will set you free.
    :crop

  3. #3
    Prudish Pervert
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    314
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by voxelectronica View Post
    No the constitution was there to make certain rights unalienable. Marriage wasn't one of those rights.
    Incorrect. The enumerated rights do not deny the existence of other rights held by the People. The Constitution's purpose is to enumerate the powers of government -- any right or power not specifically granted to the Federal Government by the Constitution is held by the People and the States.

    I draw your attention to Amendments 9 & 10, respectively:

    Amendment Nine: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
    Amendment Ten: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
    Marriage doesn't have to be an enumerated right in order for it to be a right held by the people.

  4. #4
    Mia'cova
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    northern virginia
    Posts
    132
    Post Thanks / Like
    you know, I'm a minister. (okay, I'm also pagan) I feel that the government has no right at all to control marriage. it is a religous matter, better left to your priest. if your faith say you can't be gay, then you can't be gay in that faith. if it says you have to eat blueberry muffins each morning or go to hell, you better eat your fucking muffins!!!

    keep the gov't out of religion and religion out of gov't, I say. BTW- if anyone is interested in same sex marriage, I live in virginia and close to maryland- I'll marry you. fuck the laws, because they are unconstutional.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,311
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Lisais mine View Post
    you know, I'm a minister. (okay, I'm also pagan) I feel that the government has no right at all to control marriage. it is a religous matter, better left to your priest. if your faith say you can't be gay, then you can't be gay in that faith. if it says you have to eat blueberry muffins each morning or go to hell, you better eat your fucking muffins!!!

    keep the gov't out of religion and religion out of gov't, I say. BTW- if anyone is interested in same sex marriage, I live in virginia and close to maryland- I'll marry you. fuck the laws, because they are unconstutional.

    I agree with you, but the reality is as long as the "Religious Right" is invoved in Politics Goverment will always be involved in matters like this
    Because the "Christian Conservatives" will always have imput through the Republican Party, they will support the Party and do what ever is need to get their agenda passed, whether this continues to a lesser degree in Jan after the Dems take more control of Congress is yet to be seen
    But it seems ot me and this is only an opinion, that the "Chrisitan Conservatives" have a strangle hold on the Republican Party, it is the Parties base, and they need to decide if they wish to continue with this base or move on
    The other issue is Proposition 8 is being challenged in California, those ho oppse it and want same sex marriage to remain legal, contend and I agree that this is a State Contitutional issue and that voters themselves do not have the authority to simply propose some and change the law passedo n that, It has to be changed by a Consitution State Ammendment by State Legislators and not just by a Proposition of the voters as was done, they are saying the Propostion is unconstitutional for this reason

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    10
    Post Thanks / Like
    Probably an unpopular belief but in my opinion, there should be no such thing as government marriage. As far as the government is concerned, everyone (straights and gays) should have civil unions and depending on your personal beliefs and ceremony, you can call it whatever you want. Most homosexual couples in civil unions will call their partner their spouse or husband of wife just like any married couple and many of them will have wedding ceremony as well. To me that is the most fair system for all.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top