Obama's address and the link to Socialism?

[mkemse]

Uh,

I think RickBulow is pointing to the fact obama's listed phone number on the google image is atributed to a socialist group.

I jusr did a search using the provided address, got the phone # and then used whitepages.com and got:

Party For Socialism & Liberationwork
2489 Mission St
San Francisco, CA 94110-2469

(415) 821-6171

Pretty darn odd that a Chicago address would point to a San Francisco phone number, but with obama, nothing would surprise me. No idea if this true or not, the big Goog has been known to make mistakes, but interesting coincidence to provide a socialist groups # and not a nursery or a school?

Interesting to watch over the next few months, the liberal media won't have Bush to destroy any longer and being bored will start digging into obama a bit. It will be fun to watch the things that come out and how naive voters react.

I would of thought if dirt wasgoing to do dug out on Obama is would have been BEFORE he was el;cted not after

But who know, let's give the guy a chance to show his stuff
If we don't like him, we can replace him in 4 years, look at the mistake we made in 2000 and 2004, but then again 2000 was a gift from the Supreme Court, Bush never realy won that election, the Supreme Court gave it to him

But let's just give Obama time to show himself and make decions on him AFTER January's Inauguration

Remember he is Inheriting 8 years of mess, he did not craet this mess, but he has to start cleaning it up and it won't be done in 90 days

Just remember evryone on Nov 4th 2008, we did have a choice between Obama and McCain so the election was not "Handed" to Obama

[DesertDom]

I would of thought if dirt wasgoing to do dug out on Obama is would have been BEFORE he was el;cted not after

Your kidding here, right? This is sarcasm, I really hope, you can't be this naive.

The constant plea to give the guy a chance can be put away for a while.

I think that most of us here who did not support obama are resigned ( with varying degrees of resignation) to 4 years of him and are not outwardly disparaging him for his deeds yet.

The criticisms that are being reported in the media are coming from the liberal fringe who feel he is not make decisions that meet their extemist goals. They seem always to eat their own, though, so this is nothing new.

[mkemse]

Your kidding here, right? This is sarcasm, I really hope, you can't be this naive.

The constant plea to give the guy a chance can be put away for a while.

I think that most of us here who did not support obama are resigned ( with varying degrees of resignation) to 4 years of him and are not outwardly disparaging him for his deeds yet.

The criticisms that are being reported in the media are coming from the liberal fringe who feel he is not make decisions that meet their extemist goals. They seem always to eat their own, though, so this is nothing new.

to your first question YES, scarcasm
i dod laos find it very intrestin that over they ears I do not recall am much negative criticism over an President Elect as we now have with Obmama, never heard thids about Bush before he took office, or clinotn, or Carter, or many others, why Obamam??

to the second one, for those who did not care for Obama and still don't they did have a choice of who was elected and 51-52% of the american voters selected Obama
Who knows he might even suprise eveveryone with what he does
At least he has sat on his hoches to start on solutions for some of the issues, unlike our current Adm. woh said "We didn't realize how bad things were going to be"
Kinda like the Captain of the Titanic say . "hey, folks sorry i didn't see the Iceberg
Bush has enough people working for him that SOMEONE should have advised him what was going on, if they didn't forwhat ever they reason he needed better people, I do not blame BUsh I blame his inability to choose people under him that had mor hindesight, as they say you are only as good as those you hire