Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort
Results 1 to 30 of 62

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    NA
    Posts
    869
    Post Thanks / Like
    Extreme example is right! My response is simplistic and appropriate only to your example. But the principle holds good.

    First, if we acknowledge our duties, there's no need for charity. Charity is too focused on fashionable areas of need, and ignores general needs.

    Next, why does the man burn the $100? Is there a reason? He's starving hungry and on death's door.

    Anyway, I still have a duty to give him the $100 in the first instance.

    The recipient has an obligation also. He must put that $100 to its intended use or return it.

    I think what I'm saying is, I would give my $100 to the people who can't or who don;t know how. I would not want the man who won't to have it, but I'd rather give him $100 if withholding it also deprived others who did deserve it.

  2. #2
    Just a little OFF
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,821
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by MMI View Post
    why does the man burn the $100? Is there a reason? He's starving hungry and on death's door.
    It could be a religious thing! His god doesn't like $100 bills.

    Anyway, I still have a duty to give him the $100 in the first instance.
    In your mind you, and I, have a duty. In my mind we don't. If you wish to look upon it as a duty, that's fine, it's your choice. My problem is with those who would inflict that choice upon others who think differently.

    The recipient has an obligation also. He must put that $100 to its intended use or return it.
    So it's all right to attach strings to the $100? And how do you enforce that "obligation" on the recipient? And if he takes that $100, buys a load of bricks
    and throws them through your windows, are you still obligated to give him another $100?

    I think what I'm saying is, I would give my $100 to the people who can't or who don;t know how. I would not want the man who won't to have it, but I'd rather give him $100 if withholding it also deprived others who did deserve it.
    Here again, I tend to agree. Helping those who can't and teaching those who don't know how is a laudable endeavor. But when your $100, given to those kinds of people, is then stolen by the person who won't help himself, and then burned, it would be foolish to continue throwing money into that hole until you could neutralize that idiot.
    "A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top