Quote Originally Posted by ian 2411 View Post
Duncan, Wiscoman, you have lost me a little in your deep arguement, and i am just avarage man on the street when it comes to politics. These caps on CO2 emission, just who is going to police the results in ten years or twenty years time, and if they are incorrect, what is going to happen to the defaulting country?
The plan is for there to be an extra-national body that will have the power to regulate.

Quote Originally Posted by ian 2411 View Post
China have just been given freedom to do as they please, so what is the point of it all.
China was not really given a free hand. They agreed, but refused to allow external verification. Retaining the ability to report themselves how well they are doing.

Quote Originally Posted by ian 2411 View Post
The UK and Europe agree on a cap, are we supposed to compensate for the developing countries.
The whole plan is for the "rich" countries to pay the "poor" countries for having ruined their air over the years. Here is a bit of info on UK and Europe. They signed on to Kyoto and yet after some ten years their CO2 emissions are actually higher than before. Yet the US without signing on to Kyoto has continued to reduce CO2 emissions

Quote Originally Posted by ian 2411 View Post
If the bigest poluter at the moment is unwilling to sign up, then the confrence was a failure, and dont think the Chinese will change their mind in six months or six years, because that Copenhagen confrence was water of a ducks back to them.
By this I presume you mean China, as I said above they desire to control the data reported.