That's fair comment. Is it your contention that if a gun is fired without being aimed at a specific target, and someone is killed or injured by the bullet, it is involuntary manslaughter/assault, but if it is aimed at a target and misses, it is accidental? Perhaps you are right - I'm not so sure, however.

Is your postion different where the victim is within normal range, or where, due to the weather and/or other physical conditions the bullet is carried far beyond its normal range.

Likewise, is your postion different if the victim was known by the shooter to be in the line of fire, or was not known to be there, or where the shooter couldn't have cared less whether the victim was there or not?

Another thought: where police or soldiers fire into the air to deter a crowd or to prevent a riot, are they behaving recklessly? Someone could easily be killed who was taking no part in the public disorder.