What I'm saying is its not going to pass and that its an extreme proposal with no mainstream credibility. This means its not something that's a reasonable attack on the Canadian system. So using it on a discussion in US health care to point out a flaw in the Canadian system isn't exactly a sound argument.
This would be akin to me taking the most extreme proposal on either side of the US health-care system and using that to attack US health care.
You mean like the bills currently in Congress that the majority party can not pass?