Quote Originally Posted by MMI View Post
Let's go back a baby step ... remind me where in America it is illegal to say Happy Holidays/Hanukkah/Diwali/Solstice? Or if it is not illegal anywhere yet, tell me where, realistically, it is likely to become illegal.
It's not illegal, yet. But when Christians go on a rant because some politician says Happy Holidays instead of Merry Christmas, or when they threaten to boycott stores, for the same reason, where do you imagine they are ultimately heading?

Define "like me". Are you claiming that only grumpy old atheists are protecting the Western World from the excesses of tiny extreme right-wing sects of little or no consequence, or do you agree that middle-of-the-road and even liberal Christians and other religious groups would also resist them? If the former, that's nonsense; if the latter, it's still nonsense, but how does it justify banning Christmas?
I'm not a grumpy old.... Well, yeah, I guess I am. But by "like me" I'm speaking of those, of all stripes, who refuse to kowtow to the fundamentalists. And yes, that includes even liberal Christians. And liberal Muslims. And liberal Jews.

And why this constant question about banning Christmas? The only ones who claim that atheists want to ban Christmas are those same fundamentalists who want to ban any other kind of celebrations at this time of the year.

Christmas in the courtrooms? I think we can trust the courts to deal with frivolous litigation in the way it deserves, and the higher courts to protect the system against bad laws. And on the other hand, we can depend upon them to defend our freedoms and liberties, whether we are religious and wish to celebrate religious events, or atheist and wish to celebrate whatever atheists celebrate.
Think so? Ask this father what he thinks about that!

Christmas in the legislatures? I think we can depend upon the state governments to govern their states more or less according to the wishes of the electorate, and upon the Federal government to ensure fundamental liberties guaranteed to all citizens are not eroded by unrepresentative extremists.
Just don't try running for office in these states!

For example, I doubt it would be within the powers of the New York state legislature to amend the US Constitution so as to prohibit people from wearing crucifixes or other religious symbols and forcing them to celebrate only New Year as Winter begins. So with Texas.
No, you're right about that. But given a large enough majority in Congress, theists could (and many would) try to repeal the First Amendment, and set up some sort of religious mandate.

Confining religious celebrations to churches or homes? That's effectively banning it ... as a public celebration anyway.
That was not my intent, though I understand why you think that. No, I don't mean ONLY confining it to private places, but any public celebrations or displays must be universal, not limited to only one religion, whenever they are financed by government funds. In the US, any group can apply for permits for public celebrations, and pay the required fees.

(Strange how, when I asked what they celebrated, no atheist mentioned New Year. Either they take the public expenditure on that particular non-religious event for granted, or they are so sour they don't even celebrate that.)
You asked what atheists celebrate instead of Christmas. New Years is a different holiday. And most people do celebrate it. Personally, I don't 'celebrate' much of anything. I observe some holidays, but I don't do anything special for them. My choice. Doesn't have to be yours.