New Aestheism movements

[denuseri]

Oh thank God someone else who see's the zealotry of some of the Atheists for what it is!

Thank you so very much for your wise posts here alchemystic.

Though lol Ive said much the same thing in no less than three different threads on religion and one or two on politics or current events that some overzealous atheist has sidebared into an anti-religious rant...all to little effect where some of those zealots are conserned. I wish you luck all the same though!

[thir]

Oh thank God someone else who see's the zealotry of some of the Atheists for what it is!

Thank you so very much for your wise posts here alchemystic.

Though lol Ive said much the same thing in no less than three different threads on religion and one or two on politics or current events that some overzealous atheist has sidebared into an anti-religious rant...all to little effect where some of those zealots are conserned. I wish you luck all the same though!

That is what this forum is for, right ;-)

On a general note: I have noticed have many times we have misunderstandings because of the word 'you', which means both 'you there who I am arguing with' and 'one' or 'people in general'.

I know I myself could have avoided some problems by using 'generic' after the you, maybe a thing to consider?

[Thorne]

On a general note: I have noticed have many times we have misunderstandings because of the word 'you', which means both 'you there who I am arguing with' and 'one' or 'people in general'.

I know I myself could have avoided some problems by using 'generic' after the you, maybe a thing to consider?

I agree, thir. I think this is one of the problems people have with some of my posts. I use the word "you" in a generic sense (as in "you can lead a horse to water....) Some people take it personally (as in "I never lead horses to water! What are you talking about?) I guess I should try to be more clear in my comments.