The issue is that save for Blacks and Asian it can be very hard to tell who is white and and something "else".
I do not believe that it is a "white" "non-white" issue.
As for the comment about waterboarding producing bad info. Reports about 'boarding are that it was used to initiate talking. The actionable intelligence was determined after by other means.

The original comment is based in the believe that "torture" produces no actionable intell. It may it may not. But to make such a claim also presupposes that anything gleaned by the so-called "enhanced" techniques is accepted by and of itself.

Quote Originally Posted by denuseri View Post
Actually:

I should have just said white instead of cuacasian shouldnt I, guess I couldnt keep you from trying to dance around it yet again the way I worded it orginally.

The question is do we in the USA think its ok to use on other than "white" people.out waterboarding

Many interogators, former cia members and those who train our military to resist such means of torture have said that water boarding does not in fact produce good inteligence, in fact the victums of it have a tendency to say anything you want them too to simpley make it stop and that there are far far better ways to get real information without resorting to such criminal methods.

And water boarding can and does harm, even permamently, in fact it can kill a person.

People have suffered everything from long term phcological disorders from it (including PTSD) to in some cases broken bones (as they thrashed uncontrolabely trying to get free during the torture sesssion), and heart attacks and yes even sometimes death.