I may be repeating some of what has already been said because I didn't read all of the responses, but I am offering My opinion on this subject. Morality, in my mind, is subjective. There is no objective way to state what is and is not moral. Often one's moral center is determined by their upbringing. Someone raised in a fundamentalist middle Eastern religion such as Islam may see nothing wrong with an "honor killing", where as someone raised in a fundamentalist Christian home may view the subject as "murder is murder, and 'thou shalt not kill.' " Addressing the subject at hand, what one person considers to be "violent pornography" may be seen by somebodyelse as "soft core porn". Did you know that the Uniform Code of Military Justice forbids military personnel from having sexual intercourse in any position other than missionary? The writers of that rule may very well view pornography that includes "doggy style" as being "violent pornography" where as you and I may see it as being very "vanilla" or "plain." Honestly, I don't think there's a way to objectively answer the question posed, as morality is not an objective topic. In order to objectively address this very subjective question, one must first know what set of morals is being followed and then the determination can be made as to A) Whether the pornography in question is violent or not and B) Whether the actions taking place in the pornography in question are morally defective. In short, I'd need more information to aptly answer this question.