I'm not sure you are really representative of womankind. It may be impertinent of me to say so, but that's the impression I've gained from this correspondence.
Precisely my point, (and I like impertinent people). You cant box me, I always rise above. I exercise my importance with more than whats between my legs. (as it has been suggested here that women have always done that historically). If you took the right to vote from women and a right of employment, at least the latter part, wouldn't apply to me. Some here would dance a marry jig, but what about all those average women who just want to work at their average job and have a few choices in life.
Women choose to raise their children on their own? Some do, but that number is very small. The number of men that leave their wife and children, the number of men that doesn't and refuses to pay child support...
My Husbands father was one such "gentleman", His mother raised Him and His brother on her own and worked two jobs doing so. I suppose it was her fault. And yet she managed to raise a man who is about as much of a mans man that one can be.
Nor have I any with you. But I 'm not sure changing places with you would do any good. In principle, however, I'd do it. Then you'd find that being a man isn't all it's cracked up to be either.
LOl, its been done.
Property tycoon Charles Kane is believed to be the only person in the UK to have undergone two sex change operations; the first to turn him into a woman and the second to turn him back into a man after he realised he'd made a horrible mistake. (Not the most normal of individuals, but his experience gives a very interesting perspective.)
"At first it was very enjoyable being a woman, especially being a beautiful woman in business.
"People notice you and it is much easier to make your presence felt at a meeting. I was flattered by the attention.
"I became much more creative as a person, and less aggressive. Whereas, once as a man it had taken me seconds to make a decision, I would think things through much more carefully, weighing up all the options before deciding what to do.
"People completely underestimate the effect of male and female hormones. Speaking from my own experience, they affect every part of your life, physically and emotionally.
"And then there is the sex. As a man, sex was a very physical and more enjoyable experience, but as a woman it was much more dependent on my mood and emotions.
"As a man, I thought about sex every day, but as a woman if I hadn't had sex for a couple of months I wasn't really bothered.
"Sex as a woman isn't as good anyway. It is not as intense."
"The worst part about being a woman is being treated as a sex object. I became very irritated when men I was just not interested in kept coming up to me with the worst chat-up lines I'd ever heard,"
"In fact, I found being a woman rather shallow and limiting. So much depends on your appearance, at the expense of everything else. I wasn't interested in shopping.
"My female friends would spend hours shopping for clothes, trying on different outfits. "But having been a man I knew exactly what would suit me and appeal to men. I could walk into a shop and be out again in five minutes with the right dress.
"Nor have I ever been interested in celebrity magazines or the things that interest other women, but when I tried to talk to men about blokey things they didn't take me seriously."
"Also, because I'd once been a man, I knew exactly how they thought and responded to women, so there were no surprises and no mystery for me. It all became rather boring.
"Something else I found difficult to cope with were the moods and depression which I believe were caused by taking the female hormone oestrogen.
"As a man, I was never depressed. If something bothered me, I would simply shrug it off and move on. As a woman, I felt as if I was on a rollercoaster of emotion.
"A disagreement with a boyfriend or friend would affect my mood for days."
"So nothing has really turned out the way I hoped."
I have no desire of emasculating men, both male and female perspective is needed in the work place. But to suggest that men should be given a head start just because they are male -. And what is really interesting is that most of it is just a false perception - male superiority, preferential treatment, better pay and all that
is still very much "safe" in the possession of men.
(And just a wild guess here, but you are from UK?)