Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort
Results 1 to 30 of 389

Thread: Climategate

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,218
    Post Thanks / Like
    And you are unwilling to consider any of the evidence presented to you. That puts you in the same boat in which you wish to install me. It's like arguing with a creationist -- you've got your mind made up and you're dead set on remaining wrong forever. I gave you evidence, you ignored it.
    Who is Glenn Beck?


    [QUOTE=Wiscoman;830390]
    Quote Originally Posted by DuncanONeil View Post
    As there is no PROOF to your hypothesis, either. Much of that is wishful thinking as well. Not to mention the cooked books!


    If you're not willing to look at the facts, I really don't have the time to waste with you. It's like arguing with a creationist -- you've got your mind made up and you're dead set on remaining wrong forever. I gave you evidence, you ignored it.

    If you need me, I'll be over here, talking to people who haven't let Glenn Beck rewire their brains.

  2. #2
    Aquaman's Nemesis
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    88
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by DuncanONeil View Post
    And you are unwilling to consider any of the evidence presented to you.
    It'd be a good trick on my part because you haven't actually offered any evidence. All you've done is make a bunch of declarations. If there's a link you've provided to prove anything in this thread, I must've missed it.
    Let's all be nonconformist

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,218
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiscoman View Post
    It'd be a good trick on my part because you haven't actually offered any evidence. All you've done is make a bunch of declarations. If there's a link you've provided to prove anything in this thread, I must've missed it.
    Links prove little. There is evidence that has been presented. There are specialists that have published that call into question the orthodoxy of Anthropomorphic Global Warming. These have been referred to and yet the AGW crowd simply say either;
    *"that does not matter"
    *"that is an aberration and therefore unimportant" or
    *"the consensus of science is"

    But the fact is the issue is not settled, the consensus is disputed, it is possible that the warming is aberrant. Add to that the propensity of the AGWs to hide methodology and/or raw data makes the pronouncements suspect. Then there is also the fact that the announced projections use only the worse case scenarios as the baseline.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top