Quote Originally Posted by Wiscoman View Post
It'd be a good trick on my part because you haven't actually offered any evidence. All you've done is make a bunch of declarations. If there's a link you've provided to prove anything in this thread, I must've missed it.
Links prove little. There is evidence that has been presented. There are specialists that have published that call into question the orthodoxy of Anthropomorphic Global Warming. These have been referred to and yet the AGW crowd simply say either;
*"that does not matter"
*"that is an aberration and therefore unimportant" or
*"the consensus of science is"

But the fact is the issue is not settled, the consensus is disputed, it is possible that the warming is aberrant. Add to that the propensity of the AGWs to hide methodology and/or raw data makes the pronouncements suspect. Then there is also the fact that the announced projections use only the worse case scenarios as the baseline.