Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort
Results 1 to 30 of 127

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Just a little OFF
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,821
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DuncanONeil View Post
    But that is the problem with a myth. That little kernel of truth!
    You make an assumption that all myths do indeed have such a kernel of truth. I would say, instead, that they all have a kernel of perceived truth. What is perceived as truth today, may be proven as untrue tomorrow. It was a perceived truth that the Earth was the center of the universe. We now know that to be wrong. Should we, then, give equal weight to those myths which rely upon that one-time truth?
    "A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,218
    Post Thanks / Like
    But you do agree with the kernel theory.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thorne View Post
    You make an assumption that all myths do indeed have such a kernel of truth. I would say, instead, that they all have a kernel of perceived truth. What is perceived as truth today, may be proven as untrue tomorrow. It was a perceived truth that the Earth was the center of the universe. We now know that to be wrong. Should we, then, give equal weight to those myths which rely upon that one-time truth?

  3. #3
    Just a little OFF
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,821
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DuncanONeil View Post
    But you do agree with the kernel theory.
    I will agree that they probably had some elements within them which were not completely fabricated. Like any good fiction, blending some reality into the story enhances it, making it easier to accept it as possibly real. Whether or not the primary point of the story is real depends on the particular story.

    The catastrophic flood stories, for example. Most early civilizations were centered upon large rivers or natural harbors, areas which would tend to see major flooding periodically, and truly catastrophic flooding rarely. For commoners who rarely, if ever, strayed more than a day's journey from home, seeing everything they've ever known covered in a flood would certainly engender tales of the wrath of the gods destroying the whole world. In effect, the world they knew was destroyed. Not a hard concept to understand. Taking those stories and twisting them into some sort of morality story creates the myth. An angry god: what was he angry about? (People sinned, or they didn't pray hard enough, or they didn't sacrifice enough virgins.) The world destroyed: why would he do that? (To punish everyone, guilty and innocent alike, men, women, children, even animals, except for one righteous family.) Control: how do we make sure he doesn't do that again? (Don't sin, pray harder, sacrifice more virgins. And don't forget to pay the priests.)

    So a tiny incident (globally speaking) is blown up into a major myth. Floods happen. Global floods don't.
    "A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top