Suprmem Court Ruling

[thir]

Am curious to eveyones Opnion on Yesterdays (March 2. 2011) rulingby the Suprmem Court allowing that Churh to not only Picket a funerals of Soldiers but also allowing them to shout their Obsenities at the Families of the Deceaded Soldiers
Keepingi n Mnid YES we have Freedom of Speak but also these Soldieers put their liveso n the line for us
Do youtthink that maybe the Suprmem Court in issuing it ruling should have limited thier Protrsts to sgins and Banner without ashout their Obsenities at the Familes
A;sp dp ypu agree with the Ruling that the Church CAN NOT br sued bythese Family for the Emotional Disress the family members suffer as a result of thier owrds during their protests

In October, Margie Phelps, daughter of church patriarch John Phelps, argued before the justices that Snyder's funeral was a public media event at which protesters had shown up to debate "the sins of America and the wages of war" with those attending the ceremony.

(Could not get the pc to link, but above found on Inquirer.net)

I think it is obscene
How can a funeral be a public media event??