I don't think it is a way to romanticize death for most. At least one other person in this thread has said that they saw it as the ultimate submission. I don't agree with that either, as I do think that there are fates worse than death. Instead, I see it as the ultimate objectification, the ultimate devaluation. The stripping away of what we generally consider the most basic human right.
Are there people turned on by it on both sides of the act? Absolutely. I have chatted with a few on the "snuff me" side. Their reasons varied, but they mostly centered around the idea of becoming nothing combined with the curious lack of a sense of self preservation.
Can someone consent to being "snuffed"? I can think of a few conditions where that could be the case and the person wouldn't automatically be considered insane, though they pretty much all revolve around the "snuffee" being terminally ill in some manner. The idea of consenting to death delves into some very murky ethical waters. At what point does someone need to be protected from themselves? You can't properly address this without having a bulletproof definition of insanity, which we currently lack. Instead we have the catch-all of when they seek harm upon themselves. Though by that definition, any masochist could be considered insane.
No. Suicide is either to escape, to gain control, or a case of temporary chemical imbalance. People that seek suicide by proxy (which is what snuff would be if it was another word for suicide) generally aren't that particular about how it happens. Just like people with rape fantasies, people with snuff fantasies tend to care about with whom and how it happens. People just seeking to die usually want it to happen relatively quickly and painlessly, while snuff fantasies tend to be prolonged affairs. Snuff fantasies almost always have what they feel to be a very strong sexual component, while suicide by proxy is just about getting someone else to do what they themselves cannot.Is snuff just another word for suicide?